Skip to content

Chapter 5 — Instrument Families for Dam Monitoring

5.1 A menu of measurements

This chapter surveys the instrument families used to monitor dams. Later chapters go deeper on the most safety-critical ones. For detailed installation procedures, see the Dunnicliff and FHWA manuals in this knowledge base.

5.2 Measurement categories

Category What it measures Representative instruments
Water level / reservoir Pool elevation, stage Staff gauges, pressure transducers, float gauges
Pore pressure / uplift Water pressure in soil/rock/concrete Vibrating-wire, pneumatic, standpipe, hydraulic piezometers
Seepage / leakage Flow quantity & quality Weirs, tipping buckets, turbidity sensors, observations
Deformation — surface Movement of the dam surface Survey monuments, GNSS, total station
Deformation — internal Movement inside embankment/foundation Inclinometers, extensometers, settlement systems, SAA
Structural Cracks, joint opening, load Crackmeters, joint meters, load cells, strain gauges
Environmental Rainfall, temperature, pore-air Rain gauges, thermistors, barometers
Concrete / aging Distress, alkali, corrosion Rebar corrosion probes, acoustic emission

5.3 Sensor technologies

Instruments convert a physical quantity into a readable signal. Common technologies:

  • Vibrating-wire (VW) — a tensioned wire whose frequency changes with strain; robust, drift-free, and the workhorse of modern dam monitoring.
  • Pneumatic — gas pressure balances the measured pressure; useful where power or cables are impractical.
  • Hydraulic — liquid-column pressure; simple and long-proven.
  • Electrical/resistive & inductance — potentiometers, LVDTs, and strain gauges.
  • Piezoelectric & MEMS — accelerometers, tiltmeters, and modern inertial sensors.

5.4 Manual vs. automated

  • Manual instruments are read on site with a portable readout. Low cost, but limited frequency and exposure of personnel to hazardous conditions.
  • Automated instruments feed dataloggers and telemetry, enabling high frequency, remote access, and alarms (Chapter 9).

5.5 Accuracy, resolution, and range

Three distinct concepts are often confused:

  • Accuracy — closeness to the true value (calibration matters).
  • Resolution — the smallest change the instrument can detect.
  • Range — the span over which it remains valid.

A dam may need only moderate accuracy but high resolution to detect slow trends. Specify all three, and a realistic error budget.

5.6 Selecting a family

The choice follows the planning step: match the instrument to the indicator, location, available power, accessibility, expected life, and data system. Redundancy at the most critical locations is prudent — if the one piezometer that guards a failure mode fails, the program has a blind spot.

Figure: dam-monitoring-layout

Figure. Typical instrument layout on an embankment dam: crest survey, piezometers, extensometer, inclinometer, toe drain, and seepage weir (ASCE MOP-135 scope).

5.7 Key takeaways

  • Instruments fall into water level, pore pressure, seepage, deformation, structural, and environmental families.
  • Vibrating-wire sensors are the modern workhorse; pneumatic and hydraulic remain useful.
  • Distinguish accuracy, resolution, and range — trend detection often needs resolution most.
  • Match the family to the planned indicator and environment; add redundancy at critical points.